UGREEN Revodok Pro 106 vs 107 - USB-C Hub Comparison 2026

UGREEN Revodok Pro 106 vs 107: same family, very different trade-off

The UGREEN Revodok Pro 106 and UGREEN Revodok Pro 107 look like close siblings. Both are compact USB-C hubs with one HDMI output, passthrough charging, no display driver, and 10Gbps USB data. Both are meant for MacBook, Windows laptop, Chromebook, tablet, and phone users who need a small adapter rather than a full desk dock.

The buying decision is not about brand or software. It is about which limitation you can live with.

The Revodok Pro 106 is the stronger general-purpose pick. It has a higher score in our product data, lower MSRP, 4K@60Hz HDMI, four 10Gbps data ports, and an 85W host charging ceiling from a 100W USB-C charger. It skips Ethernet, audio, card readers, and dual-monitor support, but it does the core travel-hub job cleanly.

The Revodok Pro 107 makes a different bet. It drops to 4K@30Hz HDMI and three 10Gbps data ports, but it adds SD and microSD card readers. Its product data lists 100W USB-C Power Delivery input, while the exact power reaching the laptop depends on the charger, cable, laptop demand, and attached peripherals. If your daily kit includes camera cards, that can matter more than a smoother 4K monitor.

Short verdict: The UGREEN Revodok Pro 106 wins for most people because 4K@60Hz HDMI, four fast data ports, lower MSRP, and the higher 7.1 score make it the safer everyday USB-C hub. Choose the Revodok Pro 107 only if built-in SD and microSD readers are more important than 4K60 display output.

If you are trying to decide whether a compact hub is enough or you need a larger docking station, start with our USB-C vs Thunderbolt docking stations guide and the docking station buying guide.

Quick specs comparison

Display support: 4K60 beats 4K30 for daily desktop work

Display output is the cleanest reason to choose the Pro 106. Its YAML lists one HDMI 2.0 output with a single display configuration up to 3840x2160 at 60Hz. For a 4K monitor, 60Hz makes normal desktop work feel much better. The mouse cursor moves more smoothly, window dragging feels normal, and the hub is easier to tolerate for a full workday.

The Pro 107 still supports a 4K display, but its product data lists HDMI 1.4 and a maximum 3840x2160 refresh rate of 30Hz. That is fine for slides, video playback, hotel TVs, conference-room screens, and short stretches of office work. It is not ideal if you plan to connect a 4K monitor every day and move between spreadsheets, browser tabs, design tools, or code editors.

Neither hub is a dual-monitor dock. Both max out at one external display. Both rely on USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode from the host device. That means the laptop, tablet, phone, or Chromebook must support video output over USB-C. A data-only USB-C port can still use storage and accessories, but it will not drive the HDMI port on either hub.

Mac users should also keep expectations realistic. These hubs do not use DisplayLink, so they do not add extra external display capacity to base Apple Silicon MacBooks. If your MacBook Air or base M-series Mac supports only one external display, these hubs stay within that limit. For multiple monitors, look at a DisplayLink dock, a Thunderbolt dock, or our guide to the best docking stations for dual monitors.

Display winner: UGREEN Revodok Pro 106. The difference between 4K@60Hz and 4K@30Hz is obvious in normal desktop use.

USB data ports: the Pro 106 gives you one more fast port

The Pro 106 has two USB-C 3.2 data ports and two USB-A 3.2 data ports. The YAML describes all four as 10Gbps data ports. That is a good layout for a small hub because it does not force you to choose between old USB-A accessories and newer USB-C storage. You can plug in an external SSD, a USB-C peripheral, a USB-A keyboard receiver, and a flash drive without immediately running out of fast ports.

The Pro 107 has one USB-C 3.2 data port and two USB-A 3.2 data ports. That is still better than many budget hubs that top out at 5Gbps, but it is one fast data port behind the Pro 106. The missing second USB-C data port matters more every year as small SSDs, card readers, microphones, cameras, and hubs shift away from USB-A.

Neither hub turns its USB-C data ports into monitor outputs. The Pro 106 YAML says the two USB-C data ports are for storage and peripherals, not monitor output or device charging. The Pro 107 YAML says the same thing for its single USB-C data port. Video goes through HDMI. Charger input goes through the dedicated USB-C PD port.

This is a small but important distinction. Many compact adapters have several USB-C shaped ports, but they do not all do the same job. On these hubs, USB-C can mean host cable, data port, or power input depending on the port.

USB winner: UGREEN Revodok Pro 106. It has four 10Gbps data ports instead of three, and the extra port is USB-C.

Card readers: the Pro 107 is the only one with SD and microSD

This is where the Pro 107 earns its place. The YAML lists one SD card reader and one microSD card reader, described as SD / UHS-I class and microSD / TF / UHS-I class. If you move photos, drone footage, dashcam clips, 3D printer files, or audio recorder files, having those slots built into the hub can be more useful than another USB data port.

The Pro 106 has no card reader at all. That is one of its listed cons, along with no Ethernet, no audio jack, and no second display output. You can work around it with a separate USB card reader, but that takes one of the hub’s ports and adds another thing to carry.

For creators, the choice depends on the actual display you use. If you mostly offload cards and connect to 1080p or 1440p displays, the Pro 107 can make more sense. If you edit on a 4K monitor and care about smooth cursor movement, the Pro 106 plus a separate card reader may be less annoying.

Card-reader winner: UGREEN Revodok Pro 107. It is the only model in this comparison with SD and microSD slots.

Charging: both are passthrough hubs, not power bricks

Both hubs accept USB-C power input for passthrough charging, and neither includes a charger in the YAML.

The Pro 106 is explicit: it accepts up to 100W through its USB-C PD input and can pass up to 85W to the laptop. The hub reserves some power for itself and any attached peripherals. That 85W ceiling is enough for many ultrabooks, MacBook Air models, smaller MacBook Pro configurations, iPads, Chromebooks, and Windows laptops under normal load. It is not a replacement for a workstation laptop’s original charger.

The Pro 107 YAML lists a USB-C Power Delivery input rated up to 100W. Its FAQ notes that actual power reaching the laptop depends on the charger, cable, laptop demand, and power reserved by the hub and attached accessories. That is typical passthrough-hub behavior. A 100W charger does not mean the laptop receives a full 100W after the hub and peripherals take their share.

In practice, both hubs need a proper USB-C PD charger if you expect them to power a laptop. A phone charger may run the hub but fail to keep a laptop charged. A 65W charger can work for many thin laptops. A 100W charger gives more headroom, especially when an external drive and HDMI display are connected.

Charging winner: tie with clearer specs for the Pro 106. Both support passthrough charging, but the Pro 106’s YAML gives a direct 85W host-charging ceiling.

Compatibility: both are driverless, but host video support still matters

The two hubs are very similar here. The Pro 106 and Pro 107 both list Windows, macOS, Linux, ChromeOS, and Android compatibility. Both use a driverless design with no DisplayLink or Silicon Motion driver. That keeps setup simple when the host USB-C port supports the required features.

The catch is HDMI. Both product files list USB-C ports without DisplayPort Alt Mode as known incompatibilities. If your laptop’s USB-C port is charge-only or data-only, the hub can still work for USB accessories, but HDMI will not appear. That is not a UGREEN-specific problem. It is how driverless USB-C Alt Mode hubs work.

The other shared limitation is display count. Both product files list dual-monitor desk setups as incompatible because each hub has one HDMI port and no downstream USB-C video output. If a buyer wants dual extended monitors from a MacBook Air, neither hub is the answer. If a buyer wants dual 4K monitors from a Windows laptop, neither hub is the answer either.

The Pro 107 has one extra compatibility caveat in its data: users expecting 4K at 60Hz will be disappointed because HDMI is limited to 4K at 30Hz. That caveat does not apply to the Pro 106.

Compatibility winner: UGREEN Revodok Pro 106 by a small margin. Both are plug-and-play on compatible hosts, but the Pro 106 avoids the Pro 107’s 4K30 limitation.

Portability and desk fit

Both products are small travel-style hubs with built-in cables. The Pro 106 YAML calls out an 80g compact body and a short built-in braided USB-C cable. The Pro 107 YAML also lists a short built-in USB-C cable and a compact layout.

A built-in cable is convenient in a laptop bag because you cannot forget the host cable. It is less ideal on a fixed desk, especially if the laptop sits in a vertical stand or the monitor cable pulls the hub backward. The Pro 106 lists the short cable as a minor usability con. The same concern applies to the Pro 107 even though its YAML focuses more on display refresh rate and card-slot behavior.

Neither hub has Ethernet, audio, or a second display output. The Pro 106 product file recommends stepping up to larger Revodok Pro models if you need Ethernet, card readers, audio, or dual HDMI. The Pro 107 product file gives the same type of advice for wired networking, audio, or dual displays.

This is the main reason not to overbuy the Pro 107 just because it has seven ports. It is still a compact adapter. If the hub will stay connected to a monitor, keyboard, mouse, Ethernet cable, speakers, and charger every day, you probably want a larger desktop dock instead.

Portability winner: tie. Both are travel hubs. The Pro 106 is simpler and cheaper, while the Pro 107 packs card readers into the same general format.

Price and value

The product YAML gives the Pro 106 an MSRP of $19.99 and the Pro 107 an MSRP of $49.99. Street prices can move, but the baseline value comparison is clear from the data we have: the Pro 106 costs less and scores slightly higher.

That makes the Pro 106 the better value for most buyers. You get 4K60 instead of 4K30, four fast USB data ports instead of three, and a lower listed price. The only big feature you give up is the card-reader pair.

The Pro 107’s value depends on whether those card readers replace a separate adapter you would otherwise buy and carry. If they do, the higher MSRP can be justified. If you never use SD or microSD cards, the Pro 107 asks you to pay more while accepting a weaker display output and one fewer fast data port.

Our scores reflect that split. The Pro 106 sits at 7.1/10. The Pro 107 sits at 6.9/10. That is not a massive gap, but it lines up with the buying advice: the Pro 106 is the better default, and the Pro 107 is the specialized pick for card users.

Value winner: UGREEN Revodok Pro 106. Lower MSRP, higher score, 4K60 HDMI, and one more 10Gbps data port make it the better buy unless you specifically need SD and microSD.

Verdict: buy the Pro 106 unless card readers matter more than 4K60

The UGREEN Revodok Pro 106 is the better compact USB-C hub for most people. It wins on display refresh rate, USB data-port count, score, and listed MSRP. For a simple laptop bag hub with one HDMI monitor, a few accessories, and passthrough charging, it is the more balanced choice.

Choose the UGREEN Revodok Pro 106 if:

• You want 4K@60Hz HDMI for a smoother external monitor
• You use USB-C storage or peripherals and want two USB-C data ports
• You want four 10Gbps data ports in a small hub
• You do not need built-in SD or microSD card readers
• You want the lower MSRP and the higher product score
• You need a simple driverless hub for one-monitor travel or meeting-room use

Choose the UGREEN Revodok Pro 107 if:

• You need SD and microSD readers built into the hub
• You can live with 4K@30Hz HDMI, or you mostly use 1080p and 1440p displays
• Three 10Gbps data ports are enough for your setup
• You want one compact adapter for a laptop, tablet, camera card, and occasional HDMI display
• You do not need Ethernet, audio, dual displays, DisplayLink, or Thunderbolt bandwidth

For most laptop users, the smoother 4K display output on the Pro 106 will matter more often than the card readers on the Pro 107. For photographers, drone users, and anyone who handles SD or microSD cards every week, the Pro 107 still makes sense. Just buy it with the 4K30 limit in mind.

If you are comparing these because you need a small adapter for a MacBook, also read our best docking stations for MacBook Pro page. If you need a more complete desk setup with dual displays or Ethernet, the best docking stations for home office guide is a better starting point than either of these compact hubs.