UGREEN Revodok 206 vs Revodok Pro 106 Comparison 2026

UGREEN Revodok 206 vs Revodok Pro 106

UGREEN sells both of these as compact 6-in-1 USB-C hubs, and at first glance they appear to solve the same problem. Each has an integrated USB-C host cable, a USB-C power input, HDMI, USB-C data, USB-A data, and up to 85W of laptop charging from a separate 100W USB-C charger. They are both driverless. They both rely on USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode for video. Neither has Ethernet, a card reader, an audio jack, or a charger in the box.

The similarity ends at the port priorities. The UGREEN Revodok 206 is built around displays. It has two HDMI outputs and can run two 4K displays at 60Hz on a suitable Windows computer. Its second HDMI port can also handle one 8K display at 30Hz. The trade-off is modest 5Gbps data connectivity and a more demanding host requirement for its best dual-monitor mode.

The UGREEN Revodok Pro 106 takes the opposite path. It has one HDMI 2.0 output for a single 4K display at 60Hz, but its two USB-C and two USB-A data ports all run at 10Gbps. That makes more sense for a laptop used with fast portable SSDs, cameras, wired peripherals, or a single external monitor. It also has the slightly higher editorial score, 7.1 compared with 7.0.

Short verdict: the Revodok Pro 106 is the better default hub. It gives most laptop users one dependable 4K60 display output plus four faster data ports, and it has documented support notes for Windows, macOS, Linux, ChromeOS, and Android. Pick the Revodok 206 instead only if a compatible Windows laptop needs two HDMI monitors or one 8K30 monitor. That is a real advantage, but it comes with MST and macOS caveats that buyers should understand before they order.

If you are still sorting out the difference between these kinds of adapters, read our USB-C vs Thunderbolt docking stations guide. For a wider shopping checklist, see the docking station buying guide.

Quick specs comparison

Display setup is the main difference

The Revodok 206 exists for the buyer who wants more than one screen from a small USB-C adapter. Its two HDMI ports can each run one 4K display at 60Hz on a compatible host. UGREEN also rates HDMI 2 for a single 8K display at 30Hz. For a Windows laptop with a USB-C port that supports DisplayPort Alt Mode and Multi-Stream Transport, that is an unusually capable display setup for a compact hub.

Those conditions are important. The 206 does not contain a DisplayLink chip, so it cannot create video capability that the laptop does not already have. A USB-C port that carries charging or data only will not output HDMI at all. A Windows laptop also needs MST support for two separate external desktops. The product notes and buyer feedback both point to host-dependent results: some owners report stable dual 4K60 operation, while others see a lower second-screen resolution or occasional flicker. That does not mean the hub is defective in every such case. It means the laptop, graphics hardware, cable quality, monitor modes, and available USB-C display bandwidth affect the result.

macOS deserves a separate warning. The 206 can connect two external HDMI monitors to a Mac, but the two outputs mirror the same image rather than extending two independent desktops. A Mac owner who wants one external monitor can use the hub normally. A Mac owner shopping specifically for a two-monitor workspace should choose a dock with the required native display support or a DisplayLink solution. The Revodok 206 is not the answer to that problem.

The Pro 106 has a more modest display ceiling because it has one HDMI output. It supports one display up to 4K at 60Hz when the host USB-C port supports DisplayPort Alt Mode. There is no second display output and its USB-C data ports are not video outputs. That may sound limiting next to the 206, but it makes the buying decision simpler. One monitor is the normal travel, hotel desk, meeting-room, and compact home-office use case. The Pro 106 has no dual-monitor promise that depends on MST, and it does not give Mac buyers two ports that will only mirror.

Display winner: Revodok 206, with conditions. It wins if you have verified Windows MST support and need two 4K displays, or if one 8K30 display is the goal. For a single external screen, both hubs can reach 4K60, while the Pro 106 has the simpler setup.

USB speed and peripheral flexibility

The Pro 106 wins the data section by a clear margin. It includes two USB-C 3.2 data ports and two USB-A 3.2 data ports, all rated at 10Gbps. This is useful when the hub is connected to a fast external SSD, a card reader that uses USB-A, a camera, a keyboard receiver, or other daily peripherals. It also avoids the common compact-hub problem of having only one fast port and several older ports reserved for low-speed accessories.

The Revodok 206 has one USB-C data port and two USB-A data ports, each rated at 5Gbps. That is still enough for regular external drives, keyboards, mice, webcams, and receivers. It is not a bad port selection. It is simply the deliberate compromise UGREEN made to fit dual HDMI and an 8K30 option into a small hub. If your external SSD is a major part of your workflow, 10Gbps has more value than a display port that remains unused.

The two products share a practical limitation: their USB-C data ports do not serve as monitor outputs, and they are not substitute charging ports. On the Pro 106, the product documentation specifically separates the USB-C data connections from the USB-C PD input. The same basic rule applies to the 206. Plug the charger into the dedicated PD input, use HDMI for video, and treat the data ports as peripheral connections.

USB winner: Revodok Pro 106. Four 10Gbps data ports are more useful for a broad set of compact-hub buyers than three 5Gbps ports. The 206 remains adequate for ordinary peripherals, but it is not aimed at fast external storage.

Power delivery and desk setup

There is no winner on charging. Both hubs accept up to 100W at the USB-C power input and can send up to 85W to the attached laptop. In both cases, the hub keeps part of the incoming power for its own electronics and connected peripherals. A 100W charger is the sensible choice if you want to reach the 85W host ceiling. Neither hub includes that charger.

Eighty-five watts is enough for many ultrabooks and mainstream laptops, including common MacBook and Windows productivity systems. It may not be enough for every high-power workstation or gaming laptop under sustained load. Buyers in that category should check their computer’s required charging wattage and consider a larger dock with the necessary power delivery rating.

Both hubs use short built-in host cables. That works well when the hub sits next to the laptop in a bag or on a small desk. It is less convenient when a laptop is placed in a vertical stand or far from its peripherals. Neither model solves that cabling problem, so it should not decide this comparison.

Power winner: Tie. The specifications are the same: 100W PD input, up to 85W to the host, and no included charger.

Compatibility and operating-system fit

Both hubs are driverless USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode accessories. That keeps initial setup easy, but it shifts responsibility to the host computer. Check that the USB-C port supports video before expecting HDMI to work. A USB-C connector alone is not proof of DisplayPort Alt Mode support.

The Revodok 206 documents Windows 10 and macOS support. Windows has the better use case because compatible MST hosts can extend two 4K displays. macOS can use USB data, charging, and HDMI, but its two external HDMI outputs mirror. The 206 also lists a specific incompatibility with the LG 38WN95C monitor. That is the kind of detail worth checking before building a desk around the hub.

The Pro 106 has a broader documented operating-system list: Windows 10, macOS, Linux, ChromeOS, and Android. It does not make unrealistic display promises for those systems. It needs DisplayPort Alt Mode for HDMI, it does not add a second display to a base Apple Silicon MacBook, and device power behavior can vary on Android. Those are normal USB-C caveats, but they are easier to work around than a dual-display setup that does not match the host.

The Pro 106 can get warm during heavy USB transfers or passthrough charging. Its product notes recommend keeping the aluminum body uncovered. The 206 has its own set of practical issues, including occasional monitor flicker, slower-than-charger-rated laptop charging, and USB disconnects when several high-draw peripherals are attached. Connecting power before attaching many accessories and using known-good HDMI cables are sensible first steps for either hub.

Compatibility winner: Revodok Pro 106. It has support notes for more operating systems and a one-monitor design that avoids the Revodok 206’s macOS mirroring issue. The 206 is still a valid Windows-specific choice when the host has confirmed MST support.

Value depends on whether you need the second HDMI port

The two hubs have the same six-in-one count, two-year limited warranty, 85W host charging ceiling, and missing extras. Neither includes wired networking, a media reader, an audio jack, or a power brick. Do not buy either one expecting a full desktop dock.

The Revodok 206 makes sense when two HDMI ports replace a second adapter. A compatible Windows user with two HDMI displays may get exactly what they need in a compact package. In that case, its slower data ports are an acceptable exchange for the display configuration.

For everyone else, the Pro 106 has the better balance. It supports the common single 4K60 display arrangement and gives you four 10Gbps ports for storage and peripherals. Its compact 80g body also fits the travel-hub role well. The $19.99 MSRP recorded for the Pro 106 reinforces that budget-hub positioning, though retail prices change and should be checked before purchase.

Value winner: Revodok Pro 106 for most people. The faster port mix applies every day, while the 206’s display advantage only matters to a narrower group of compatible Windows dual-monitor users.

Verdict: choose the Pro 106 unless you need Windows dual HDMI

The Revodok Pro 106 wins this comparison because it is the more broadly useful compact USB-C hub. Its single 4K60 HDMI port covers a normal external-monitor setup, four 10Gbps data ports are genuinely useful for fast peripherals, and its compatibility notes cover a wider set of operating systems. The 7.1 score is only a small edge over the 206’s 7.0, but it fits the practical differences in their specifications.

The Revodok 206 has a legitimate specialty. It can drive two 4K60 monitors from a compatible Windows MST laptop, and it can run one 8K30 display from HDMI 2. Those capabilities can outweigh its 5Gbps USB ports for the right desk. They are not universal features, though. macOS mirrors the two HDMI outputs, and USB-C video support must be verified on the host.

Choose the UGREEN Revodok Pro 106 if:

• You use one 4K60 HDMI display and want faster USB storage and peripherals.
• You need two USB-C and two USB-A data ports, all rated at 10Gbps.
• You use macOS, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, or a Windows laptop and want a simpler one-monitor hub.
• You travel with a compact hub and do not need Ethernet, a card reader, or audio.

Choose the UGREEN Revodok 206 if:

• Your Windows laptop has USB-C DisplayPort Alt Mode and MST, and you need two HDMI monitors.
• You need one compatible 8K display at 30Hz through HDMI 2.
• You can accept three 5Gbps data ports in exchange for a dual-HDMI setup.
• You have checked your laptop, monitors, cables, and operating-system limits before relying on its dual-display mode.

Read the individual UGREEN Revodok 206 review and UGREEN Revodok Pro 106 review for full product details. If neither has enough ports for your desk, our best docking stations for home office page is a better place to continue the search.